A detailed analysis of the post D-Day struggle

This book though controversial upon publication has become the standard interpretation of the struggle from Caen to Falaise and the irritations between the Allied Commanders. I believe Carlo D'Este has put forward a fair and unbiased summary of events with painstaking analysis. The crux of the thesis is unfortunately that Monty was rather mendacious in cementing his image for posterity. The sad realisation for me was that many military commanders ( and perhaps the most effective) are ultimately driven by ego and a desire for a place in dusty history books and many have to die to appease this appetite. That said, I am grateful to Monty, Bradley, Patton and Ike, and all those who served and to rid Europe of Nazism. The book concentrates on strategy and interpersonal relationships and the reader will need to avail himself of maps to familiarise himself with the events and movements of those evocative names Villers Bocage, Goodwood, Epsom, Charnwood and Cobra.
The narrator stumbles occasionally on the pronunciation of French place names and acronyms but I guess many US troops did just the same. He also has trouble with the cadence of military literature and exposition but I found it a riveting listen none the less.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

Loads of historical content let down by narration

Would you try another book written by Carlo D'Este or narrated by Tom Weiner?

Author yes, narrator no.

What other book might you compare Decision in Normandy to, and why?

I dunno about compare to, but it's a good companion to say a Max Hastings or similar book about the Normandy campaign, as it covers the high-level military decisions and interactions, which a lot of the other books don't.

What didn’t you like about Tom Weiner’s performance?

Frequently impossible to tell where narration ends and quoting someone starts. Reading was deathly dull, with very little light and shade, and very poor at pausing for section and chapter breaks. Quite spoiled what would have been an excellent book.

Any additional comments?

The recording that made me appreciate the art of narrating an audio book. Sadly for all the wrong reasons.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Outdated

The book might as well be called Why Britain Sucks. Extremely anglophobic, very pro American and German, filled with myths that have since been debunked

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Very American

The narrator’s pronunciation of Bernard Montgomery was really irritating as was the pronunciation of ‘Loo-tenant’ for British Army personnel. Found the book too biased towards how wonderful the Americans were and how inept the British were. It would have been far better if it’d been more balanced and rather than rant on about Montgomery the author actually spent more time on exploring and explaining actual military events. Personalities on both sides were difficult but the author glosses over the foibles of Patton, Bradley and Eisenhower. I got fed up with the book as it didn’t cover anything that’s not been better explained by better authors and the constant criticisms became extremely boring.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!