Hue 1968 cover art

Hue 1968

A Turning Point of the American War in Vietnam

 Preview
Try Premium Plus free
Pick 1 audiobook a month from our unmatched collection - including bestsellers and new releases.
Listen all you want to thousands of included audiobooks, Originals, celeb exclusives, and podcasts.
Access exclusive sales and deals.
£8.99/month after 30 days. Renews automatically. See here for eligibility.

Hue 1968

By: Mark Bowden
Narrated by: Joe Barrett
Try Premium Plus free

£8.99/month after 30 days. Renews automatically. See here for eligibility.

Buy Now for £21.99

Buy Now for £21.99

Confirm Purchase
Pay using card ending in
Switch payment method
By completing your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and authorise Audible to charge your designated card or any other card on file. Please see our Privacy Notice, Cookies Notice and Interest-based Ads Notice.
Cancel

About this listen

Not since his New York Times best seller Black Hawk Down has Mark Bowden written a book about a battle. His most ambitious work yet, Huế 1968, is the story of the centerpiece of the Tet Offensive and a turning point in the American War in Vietnam.

By January 1968, despite an influx of half a million American troops, the fighting in Vietnam seemed to be at a stalemate. Yet General William Westmoreland, commander of American forces, announced a new phase of the war in which "the end begins to come into view". The North Vietnamese had different ideas. In mid-1967, the leadership in Hanoi had started planning an offensive intended to win the war in a single stroke. Part military action and part popular uprising, the Tet Offensive included attacks across South Vietnam, but the most dramatic and successful would be the capture of Huế, the country's cultural capital. At 2:30 a.m. on January 31, 10,000 National Liberation Front troops descended from hidden camps and surged across the city of 140,000. By morning, all of Huế was in Front hands save for two small military outposts.

The commanders in country and politicians in Washington refused to believe the size and scope of the Front's presence. Captain Chuck Meadows was ordered to lead his 160-marine Golf Company against thousands of enemy troops in the first attempt to reenter Huế later that day. After several futile and deadly days, Lieutenant Colonel Ernie Cheatham would finally come up with a strategy to retake the city, block by block and building by building, in some of the most intense urban combat since World War II.

With unprecedented access to war archives in the US and Vietnam and interviews with participants from both sides, Bowden narrates each stage of this crucial battle through multiple points of view. Played out over 24 days of terrible fighting and ultimately costing 10,000 combatant and civilian lives, the Battle of Huế was by far the bloodiest of the entire war. When it ended, the American debate was never again about winning, only about how to leave. In Huế 1968, Bowden masterfully reconstructs this pivotal moment in the American War in Vietnam.

©2017 Mark Bowden (P)2017 Audible, Inc. 20th Century Asia Military Modern Southeast Asia War Vietnam War City Thought-Provoking

Listeners also enjoyed...

 Into the Bright Sunshine cover art
A Rumor of War cover art
Grunts cover art
The Boer War cover art
The 13th Valley cover art
Black Hawk Down cover art
Killing Pablo cover art
The Brave Ones cover art
A Foot Soldier for Patton cover art
The Odyssey of Echo Company cover art
A War of Empires cover art
Enemy at the Gates cover art
The Things They Carried cover art
Britain's War cover art
Born Twice cover art
Dog Company cover art

Critic reviews

"Narrator Joe Barrett's voice, always scratchy, careworn, and haggard, has just the sound this book needs to carry it forward. He sounds like an old boot and offers no quarter when detailing the battle's ravages, both in terms of men and American strategy." (AudioFile)
All stars
Most relevant  
easy to understand. accounts from those there rather than bogged down in military strategy that doesn't work too well with no maps as an audiobook

great read

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
volume about a very difficult period of US and Vietnamese history. Well narrated as usual.

Very well written

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
good book
educational and interesting
well read and layed out
would recommend if interested in Vietnam War

interesting and well researched

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

What did you like most about Hue 1968?

Until I read Mark Bowden's outstanding Hue - 1968, I hadn't really appreciated the significance of Tet and Hue as a turning point in the Vietnam war. This is military history at its best, combining detailed research with clear, objective and compelling analysis. In other contexts, the level of detail would be confusing but Hue was such a complex and fragmented battle that Bowden is able to assemble all the disparate elements into a coherent narrative. It is only in the detail that you see the disconnect between the higher levels of command on both sides and the tactical actions on the ground. Bowden is balanced and objective about the significant failure of US generalship at theatre commander and formation level and his indictment of Westmorland, LaHue and Tolson in particular is salutary. In Bowden's view, the indictment is not just of incompetence but of wilful and arrogant self-delusion, which they translated into unrealistic and bombastic orders which got a large number of their subordinates killed and wounded in futile attacks. Bowden's review of the military-strategic and political context is also compelling but is more familiar territory. His judgment that the Press reporting was accurate, objective and in the public interest contrasts starkly with the popular misconception in the US that the Press unfairly influenced the US people to turn against the war. This book is definitive and a landmark in the literature of Vietnam, standing with the handful of books which provide real and original insight into a tragic and misdirected war.

What was one of the most memorable moments of Hue 1968?

Bowden's account of the shock and impact of the initial Front assault on Hue and shock and disbelief it achieved amongst the US troops. His account of the early defence of the MACV compound in Hue is memorable. His later portrayal of street fighting to recover the Triangle brings to life urban combat and we see a privileged view of what it was like for both sides and for the civilians caught up in the fighting.

What does Joe Barrett bring to the story that you wouldn’t experience if you had only read the book?

Joe Barrett is masterful. He narrates with real understanding and sympathy for the subject, avoids melodrama, has an engaging and lively voice which draws you to the narrative and keeps your attention. You really feel his deep engagement with the personalities involved and this creates an impression of intimacy which is the strength of the audiobook format. One of the best and in stark contrast to the narrators of other audio books who have little understanding of or sympathy with their subject and an inflated view of their thespian abilities. Joe Barratt avoids both traps and is a master of his craft.

Did you have an emotional reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?

It's military history. I read it with objective and detached interest. That said, Mark Bowden has interviewed many of the personalities in the book and has an obvious rapport with them which translates into many moving and human passages.

Any additional comments?

A fine book and one that particularly suits the audio format. Thank you to Mark Bowden and Joe Barrett for many hours well spent listening to their words.

Outstanding Military History

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Not the usual gung ho rubbish. This book attempts to tell the story from different sides. it felt like very balanced tale, and gripping too.

Very insightful book

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
REads like a thriller, especially in the first half.
The Audible version is missing the maps, references and pictures. The chapters are listed as 1-56 instead of part 1 "name", chapter 1 "name", chapter 2 "name" and then PArt 2 etc. So its harder to understand where you are if there is a problem or get an overview of the book from its chapter list. Also there is an advantage to seeing names in print. It kind of needs a written reference section. I know some books have them but I didn't see one.

A thriller but exposes Audible problems

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
it was a fantastic history of a battle that had briefly entered into my fascination with the indo-china area. Bowden is a brilliant author, historian & journalist

awesome

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
More than you thought you needed to know about the battle for Hue. Bowden has put together a masterpiece, first hand accounts from those who were there, both American and Vietnamese. He expertly covers the buildup, opening and the prolonged slog of the month long battle. Joe narrates it superbly. I went on a binge with this book and will be looking at what else Bowden has to offer.

Incredible detail

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
This is a gripping, well written and very important book. Defines that war so well but frightening how so many lessons learnt have been ignored since then. Perfect blend of narrative, observation and context - and from all sides. The narration is perfect. Can’t wait to start this again.

Brilliant and important history

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
Bowden is an odd author, writing the superb Black Hawk Down followed by a turgid book on Pablo Escobar. I stopped reading his books after being disillusioned by the Pablo puff-piece. At his best he's brilliant, and while this account of the battle of Hue does not have the 'real-time, as it happens' perspective that made Black Hawk Down so gripping, it is nonetheless a thorough and harrowing account of the battle. Its a good subject, but has Bowden lost his magic? The author has a journalists mentality of only reporting the facts. In Blackhawk down he used the facts to tell a 'story' as it happened, like in a novel, only each sentence was backed up with studied references and interviews. He has changed his style for this book, and not for the better in my opinion. He now tries to write as a historian, but he seems to lack the understanding that great historians (such as Max Hastings) delve deep into nuances, context and use their intuition to tease out intentions. Bowden just reports like a newspaperman, not a historian. Facts only please, gentlemen. For example, any perspective or context of the battle is given by quoting his interviewees. This is great for a newspaper, bad for a historical account. Interviewees want to seem smart with the benefit of hindsight. He criticises Westmoreland for this, but fails to see that all of the people he speaks to after the war is going to puff themselves up, given justifications after-the-fact, and want to show themselves as being smarter than they were. Particularly the Vietnamese who won the war and ended up the worse for it. He reports everything they say as 'the truth,' apart from Westmoreland who he seems to have a personal grudge against and is the only one he berates for spinning the facts. Another problem of his journalistic account is that he tends to make both sides seem equally as bad because he is afraid to take sides. Good journalists are discouraged from getting involved in the nitty gritty of context and opinion. Good historians live for the nitty gritty of context and opinion. Great historians frame the context of their subject for the rest of us - for them context, opinion and intuition are the meat and potatoes of their work. Bowden is either afraid of having an opinion, or afraid of venturing it. For example, the political murders enacted by the Communists he equates with the subsequent tit-for-tat murders by the South Vietnamese. In his journalist mind, they are one and the same. Reading between the lines, I'm not so sure that the South Vietnamese would have killed the NVA sympathisers if the NVA hadn't brutalised and murdered politicians and uncooperative civilians. Bowden simply equates the two sides, implying both were equally wicked. True, in a literal sense, but I'm not convinced the South Vietnamese would have sought bloody retribution if the Communists had not insisted on the torture and brutalisation of the civilians in the first place. Bowden ducks the issue. A good historian would examine the issue in detail and perhaps conclude that 'what goes around comes around.' He interviews the Vietnamese combatants that are still alive, but fails to ask the obvious question: "was it worth it?" The Vietnamese who fought against the Americans are proud and even boastful, but Bowden doesn't even hint that the country they live in is far worse than what may have been had they 'lost.' Modern Vietnam is no place to live compared to South Korea or Japan, both South East Asian allies of the US. He doesn't confront them with this and ask if living in a poor police-state was worth their sacrifice. Also, I would like to have him dig a little harder into the disillusionment of the NVA who expected the city of Hue to rise against the Americans. Stories, particularly factual accounts, are about real people. I want to know what those NVA felt when they realised the people weren't buying Communism. Journalism is dry, without context and open to interpretation. A good history book should be the opposite - it needs context, consideration, and a point of view. Bowden's journalistic heritage makes for an accurate, if dry read, and one that feels ultimately unsatisfying. Either he is afraid to venture an opinion because of his journalistic instincts, or because he's an American and can't face the pain of examining the war. Without context and a framing opinion, the book is lightweight and unsatisfying. But at least it isn't about Pablo Escobar. Be thankful for small mercies.

Journalistically worthy, but dry and unsatisfying

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
See more reviews