Listen free for 30 days
Listen with offer
-
Team Topologies: Organizing Business and Technology Teams for Fast Flow
- Narrated by: Edward Bauer
- Length: 6 hrs and 31 mins
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
£0.00 for first 30 days
Buy Now for £14.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
Summary
Effective software teams are essential for any organization to deliver value continuously and sustainably. But how do you build the best team organization for your specific goals, culture, and needs?
Team Topologies is a practical, step-by-step, adaptive model for organizational design and team interaction based on four fundamental team types and three team interaction patterns. It is a model that treats teams as the fundamental means of delivery, where team structures and communication pathways are able to evolve with technological and organizational maturity.
In Team Topologies, IT consultants Matthew Skelton and Manuel Pais share secrets of successful team patterns and interactions to help listeners choose and evolve the right team patterns for their organization, making sure to keep the software healthy and optimize value streams.
Team Topologies is a major step forward in organizational design for software, presenting a well-defined way for teams to interact and interrelate that helps make the resulting software architecture clearer and more sustainable, turning inter-team problems into valuable signals for the self-steering organization.
PLEASE NOTE: When you purchase this title, the accompanying PDF will be available in your Audible Library along with the audio.
What listeners say about Team Topologies: Organizing Business and Technology Teams for Fast Flow
Average customer ratingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Silvia
- 27-01-24
Strong insights for newborn teams
The structure of the book is very theoretical. Lot of useful information. Not so good reading performance. Thank you.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Anonymous User
- 13-08-20
A book that would be better to read then listen to
The book refers to a lot of diagrams that one would benefit from seeing
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
2 people found this helpful
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Amazon Customer
- 12-10-21
Fascinating read
Great book, really easy to follow even though Im not in the field. think the concepts apply to general business beyond just Software Engineering.
Felt the narration might have been picked for the American readers.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Olof Andreassen
- 15-01-23
Excellent book
Excellent content, narrator brings the overall experience down however.
About to start my third cover-to-cover session.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Rui Silva
- 23-02-20
Teams First!
Manuel and Mathew have one of freshest views on software development organizations I have seen in a while. This is not another [something] first, the is a grounded view on how team types and they way they interact has a major impact on the outcome of any software (and I'd go as far as saying any) systems. Very well written and easy to follow, if a little repetitive at times.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Notally_Not_A_Robot
- 27-04-23
Can be dangerous
I had an epiphany when listening to this, that, if said to my boss and his bosses, might get me fired.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- LC
- 19-06-20
Useful concepts - a bit abstract
The concepts about team structure influencing flow and technical architecture make a lot of sense, and I am sure a lot of benefit can be gained by implementing them in the right way. However, I found it all quite abstract, with a lack of concrete examples, and therefore hard to understand what it really means in practice and how to implement it.
It would be great to have plenty of examples of the right and wrong way to implement each element.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
1 person found this helpful
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Cláudio P
- 05-11-19
An excellent starting point to organize teams
A good guide to help you organizations to achieve a good team architecture.
the concepts are simple to understand and the logic behind is simple to relate with the reality in most organizations.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Oleksiy M.
- 26-02-24
Teams-first approach is worth considering for any software developing organization
The emphasis on teams-first approach to software engineering bounded by the cognitive load and team interaction patterns is worth familiarizing with for any organization engaging in a nontrivial software development activity. One of the most memorable pieces: "Dispending well performing team is worse than vandalism", cannot disagree. Well-written, concise, sound. Features a fair number of case studies, although I personally would prefer (some of) them to go deeper into the details of the case.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Anonymous User
- 21-01-21
Fairly technical and a bit dry, but still good
Fairly technical and a bit dry, but still good. I liked the simplicity but could be more engaging
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!